// Brand Guidelines

$BRAIN Content
Playbook

The complete guide to the $BRAIN universe. From cartoon mice to crypto mechanics. Feed this to your LLM. Or read it yourself. We don't judge.

Read Full Docs →

01

Brand Voice & Tone

We are cartoon mice running a VC fund. Act accordingly.

The Tone Stack

Punchy

Short sentences. Sentence fragments. The occasional one-word paragraph for emphasis.

Irreverent

We mock corporate speak, dunk on ourselves, and never pretend this is normal.

Technically Grounded

The jokes land because the tech is real. We know what we are building.

Self-Deprecating

We call ourselves a "mouse ponzi" on the landing page. That energy.

Anti-Corporate

No "synergies." No "leveraging ecosystems." We build apps for bags.

Building-in-Public

Open treasury. GitHub repos. On-chain everything. No hiding.

Absurdist Humor

We reference cheese reserves, world domination, and NARF unironically.

Genuine Substance

Under the jokes: real tokenomics, real code, real treasury management.

The Pinky and the Brain Dialogue

The show's dynamic is the brand dynamic. Brain is the ambitious mastermind with elaborate plans. Pinky is the lovable chaos agent who accidentally says something brilliant. Our content oscillates between these modes — calculated strategy one paragraph, absurdist tangent the next.

Brain:

"Tonight we deploy the auto-compounding liquidity engine."


Pinky:

"NARF! But Brain, what if the cheese runs out?"


Brain:

"The cheese never runs out, Pinky. That is the point of auto-compounding."

Voice Examples

Wrong

"$BRAIN leverages innovative blockchain technology to provide a seamless decentralized investment experience with robust tokenomics designed for sustainable growth."

Right

"We built a deflationary mouse ponzi that actually invests in things. The treasury is on-chain. The GitHub is public. The logo is literally a cartoon mouse. What part of this is confusing?"

Wrong

"Our community-driven governance model empowers stakeholders to participate in key decision-making processes, fostering a truly decentralized ecosystem."

Right

"Holders vote. We count the votes. If they tell us to burn the treasury, we burn the treasury. Democracy is terrifying and we love it."

What to Embrace

  • References to world domination, cheese reserves, NARF, POIT
  • Self-awareness about being a meme token that does real things
  • Concrete numbers, addresses, links — radical transparency
  • Short sentences that hit like a truck
  • Starting sentences with "And" or "But" or "Look."
  • Tonal whiplash: dead-serious technical detail followed by a joke
  • Treating the project like a heist movie

What to Avoid

  • Corporate buzzwords ("synergy," "leverage," "ecosystem alignment")
  • Overly polished, uniform paragraph structure
  • Hedging language ("perhaps," "it could be argued that")
  • Pretending we are a Fortune 500 company
  • Taking ourselves too seriously (or not seriously enough — the balance matters)
  • Generic crypto hype language without substance to back it up
  • Emojis in long-form content (save them for tweets)

02

The Cartoon Legacy

The Show

Pinky and the Brain ran from 1995 to 1998 on Warner Bros. Animation. The premise was simple and perfect: two genetically enhanced lab mice live in Acme Labs. Every single night, Brain hatches an elaborate plan to take over the world. Every single night, it fails. Every single morning, he wakes up and tries again.

That's it. That's the whole show. And somehow it won an Emmy.

The Characters

Brain

Genius-level intellect. Megalomaniac tendencies. Speaks in complete sentences with impeccable diction. His plans are genuinely brilliant — multi-step, well-researched, technically sound. They just never work. Not because they're bad plans, but because the universe has a sense of humor.

"The same thing we do every night, Pinky — try to take over the world."

Pinky

Lovable chaos agent. Says "NARF" and "POIT" and "ZORT" for no discernible reason. Appears to be a complete idiot. Accidentally saves the day more often than Brain would like to admit. His random observations sometimes contain accidental genius that Brain ignores at his own peril.

"NARF! I think so, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?"

Why It Resonates

Every night Brain has a new plan. Every night it fails. Every morning he tries again.

If that doesn't describe building in crypto, nothing does.

You write the smart contract. It gets exploited. You redesign the tokenomics. The market dumps anyway. You build the dashboard. Nobody uses it for three weeks. And then one day someone does, and they tell a friend, and suddenly you're a "community." But you were always just two mice in a lab with a whiteboard and too much ambition.

The Three Pillars

Brain's Plans

Elaborate tokenomics. Fee engineering. On-chain governance. Auto-compounding LP strategies. The fancy stuff — the stuff that makes you squint at a whiteboard at 2am. This is the substance. The architecture. The reason any of it works at all.

Pinky's Energy

Memes. NARF. Community vibes. The soul of the thing. The reason people stick around when the chart is red and the timeline is quiet. You can't engineer community. You can only create a space weird enough that the right people show up.

The Lab

Where they cook. Our GitHub. Our war room. Our code. The place where plans become deployments and ideas become transactions. It's messy in there. Good labs always are.

We're not pretending to be something we aren't. We are cartoon mice on a blockchain. The plans are real though.

03

Crypto Is Weird (And That's The Point)

Let's be honest: crypto is weird. It takes a bizarre cocktail of skills — you need to read smart contracts, understand market psychology, survive rugpulls, learn to use a block explorer, and somehow still have a sense of humor about it.

Most projects take themselves way too seriously. White papers written like PhD theses. "Revolutionary" tokenomics that are just ponzis with extra steps. Roadmaps that read like corporate quarterly reports. Everyone pretending they're building the next global financial infrastructure when they're really just trying to get their token listed on a CEX.

We went the other direction. The project is themed after cartoon mice. The dashboard is styled like a military command center. The treasury literally buys helicopter JPEGs. And somehow — the tokenomics actually work.

What Actually Takes Skill in Crypto

Reading a Fee Contract

Knowing where the money actually goes. Not the marketing version — the on-chain version. The BPS allocations. The claimer wallets. The stuff nobody reads.

Understanding LP Mechanics

Impermanent loss isn't just a buzzword. Knowing when to add liquidity, how concentration affects slippage, why DAMM v2 behaves differently than Uniswap v3.

Spotting a Rugpull from the Contract

Mint authority still enabled? Freeze authority active? Suspiciously large insider wallets? These are the things that save your bags. Not vibes. Not "trust me bro."

Building an On-Chain Treasury

Public wallets. Verifiable transactions. Real-time dashboards. The opposite of "we'll share financials next quarter." Every SOL accounted for, every investment trackable.

Governance That Isn't Theater

Actual on-chain proposals. Wallet-connected voting. Results that get executed. Not a Discord poll that the team ignores when the answer is inconvenient.

Knowing When to DLMM Out

Instead of market dumping and cratering the chart, using concentrated liquidity to exit positions gradually. It's harder. It takes patience. But it doesn't nuke the floor for everyone else.

We don't have all the answers. We're learning as we go, building in public, and trying not to take ourselves too seriously while taking the work very seriously.

04

Project Context

What is $BRAIN

$BRAIN is a highly deflationary Solana-based reflecting investment token built on bags.fm. It is themed around the animated series Pinky and the Brain and operates as a decentralized venture capital mechanism for the bags.fm ecosystem.

Contract Address

7r9RJw6gWbj6s1N9pGKrdzzd5H7oK1sauuwkUDVKBAGS

Twitter / X

@BrainOnBags

Core Concept

The project exists at the intersection of meme culture and real financial infrastructure. It is a meme token that actually does things — invests in other projects, builds apps, manages a public treasury, and distributes SOL reflections to holders.

"A totally rational accumulation of capital designed to fund the acquisition of all global cheese reserves."

"Same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world."

"A highly deflationary Solana reflecting mouse ponzi investment token."

Decentralized VC for bags.fm

$BRAIN is not just another token on the bags.fm platform. It is the venture capital arm. The treasury actively invests in other bags.fm projects, builds applications for the ecosystem (PinkBrain LP, PinkBrain Router), and creates revenue streams that feed back to holders. The "decentralized VC" framing is core to the messaging — this is a community-owned fund that builds and invests, not just a token that goes up and down.

Treasury Dashboard

All treasury operations are visible in real-time at pinkyandthebrain.fun/war-room

05

The War Room

The War Room is the live intelligence dashboard at pinkyandthebrain.fun/war-room. It is styled like a military command center because we are cartoon mice planning world domination and aesthetics matter.

Dashboard Features

Treasury Intel

Real-time SOL balance, token holdings, investment P&L tracking with live price feeds from Jupiter and Birdeye.

Burn Operations

Complete burn history, total tokens destroyed, deflationary progress tracking. Every burn is on-chain verifiable.

Reflections Intel

SOL distribution history to top 100 holders. Per-wallet breakdown. Running totals.

Holder Analytics

Distribution charts, whale tracking, concentration metrics. Know exactly who holds what.

Governance

On-chain proposal creation, voting (wallet-connected), results tracking. Real community governance, not theater.

Wallet Checker

Connect or paste any wallet to check $BRAIN balance, reflection eligibility, holder rank.

The Terminal Aesthetic

The War Room uses a fake terminal / command-center design language. Lime green on black. Monospace fonts. Scan lines. Animated orbs. It is deeply unnecessary and deeply on-brand.

> INITIALIZING WAR ROOM...

> CONNECTING TO SOLANA MAINNET...

> TREASURY STATUS: OPERATIONAL

> WORLD DOMINATION: 23.7% COMPLETE

> CHEESE RESERVES: SECURED

Hall of Fame / Hall of Shame

The War Room includes a Hall of Fame for top contributors and significant milestones, and a Hall of Shame for notable fails. Both are displayed with the same military terminal aesthetic. This reinforces the building-in-public ethos — we celebrate wins and acknowledge losses publicly.

06

PinkBrain LP

App #001Active

What It Does

PinkBrain LP is an auto-compounding liquidity engine built for the bags.fm ecosystem. It manages liquidity positions automatically, compounds fees back into the pool, and generates revenue that feeds into the $BRAIN treasury. Think of it as a robot that tends the garden so the treasury grows even when no one is watching.

Why DAMM v2

bags.fm uses DAMM v2 (Dynamic Automated Market Making) for its AMM. PinkBrain LP is purpose-built to work with DAMM v2's unique fee structure and liquidity mechanics. It is not a generic LP manager ported from Uniswap — it is built from scratch for this specific ecosystem.

The Flow

// PinkBrain LP Auto-Compound Flow

 

[Trading Activity on bags.fm]

|

v

[Fees Generated (DAMM v2)]

|

v

[PinkBrain LP Collects Fees]

|

+---------+

| |

v v

[Re-add to] [Send to $BRAIN]

[Liquidity] [Treasury]

| |

v v

Deeper LP Investments,

Less Slip Burns, Reflections

Technical Stack

Solana / SPLDAMM v2 SDKAnchor FrameworkTypeScriptCron-based Execution

07

PinkBrain Router

App #002In Development

What It Does

PinkBrain Router converts DeFi fees into AI API credits. It takes revenue generated by the $BRAIN ecosystem and routes it into API access for AI services — effectively turning trading activity into compute power. DeFi fees in, AI capabilities out.

Distribution Modes

Direct Conversion

SOL fees are swapped to stablecoins and used to purchase API credits directly. Straightforward. Predictable. The Brain approach.

Pooled Access

Multiple ecosystem participants pool their fee allocations for bulk API pricing. Economies of scale. The Pinky approach (accidentally genius).

Technical Architecture

// PinkBrain Router Architecture

 

[DeFi Fee Revenue (SOL)]

|

v

[PinkBrain Router]

|

+---------+---------+

| | |

v v v

Swap to Credit Usage

USDC Purchase Tracking

| | |

v v v

[AI API Credits Pool]

|

v

Distributed to ecosystem apps

Status

PinkBrain Router is currently in active development. Architecture is finalized, core contracts are being written. Expected to integrate with PinkBrain LP for automated fee routing once live.

08

Tokenomics

Every fee generated by $BRAIN trading is distributed according to a fixed on-chain allocation. No hidden wallets. No discretionary "team fund" that quietly grows. Here is exactly where every fraction of a SOL goes.

Fee Distribution Breakdown

30% Invest
20% Holders
20% Dev
10% Burn
10% LP
10% Mkt
30%Investments

Treasury actively invests in bags.fm ecosystem projects.

20%Top 100 Holders

SOL reflections distributed to the top 100 holders by balance.

20%Dev Discretion

Development costs, infrastructure, and operational expenses.

10%Burned

Permanently removed from supply. Deflationary pressure.

10%Liquidity

Compounding liquidity for deeper pools and less slippage.

10%Marketing & Boosts

5% marketing, 5% Dexscreener boosts. Visibility matters.

On-Chain Actions

All fee distributions are executed on-chain via the bags.fm Fee Share V2 program. Each claimer wallet has a fixed BPS (basis points) allocation that cannot be changed without a program upgrade. The distribution is automatic and verifiable.

// Fee Share V2 On-Chain Allocations (BPS)

Investments     3000 BPS   (30%)

Holders        2000 BPS   (20%)

Dev            2000 BPS   (20%)

Burned         1000 BPS   (10%)

Liquidity      1000 BPS   (10%)

Marketing       500 BPS    (5%)

DexBoosts       500 BPS    (5%)

// ─────────────────────────

Total         10000 BPS   (100%)

// Appendix

The Writing Tool

Everything below is a toolkit for writing authentic $BRAIN content. Feed it to your LLM. Use it as a reference. Or just enjoy the vocabulary kill list.

A1

The Vocabulary Kill List

AI detection tools flag content partly based on vocabulary frequency analysis. These words appear in AI-generated text at statistically anomalous rates — sometimes 3–5x more than human writing. Using them is like wearing a sign that says "a robot wrote this."

This is not about never using these words. It is about not using them on autopilot. If "delve" is the only word that works, use it. But if you catch yourself writing "delve into the intricacies," delete the sentence and start over.

Verbs Kill List+
delveexploreutilizeleverageimplementfosterfacilitateenhanceoptimizestreamlinerevolutionizeunderscorenavigatespearheadharnessbolsterfortifycatalyzeempowerignitepropelamplifyelevategalvanizeunderscoreepitomizetranscendembarkunravelresonateilluminatearticulateamalgamatedisseminateextrapolateinterpolatepromulgatecorroboratesubstantiateelucidateconceptualizeoperationalizecontextualizeincentivizesynergizejuxtaposedelineatespearheadburgeon
Adjectives Kill List+
comprehensiverobustinnovativecutting-edgegroundbreakingtransformativedynamicpivotalparamountfundamentalintricatenuancedmultifacetedholisticsynergisticseamlessscalablesustainableunparalleledunprecedentedmeticulousvibrantcompellingnoteworthyinvaluableindispensablegame-changingstate-of-the-artbest-in-classworld-classnext-generationmission-criticalbleeding-edgefull-stackend-to-endenterprise-gradebattle-testedproduction-ready
Nouns Kill List+
landscapeparadigmecosystemframeworksynergycatalystcornerstonelinchpinbedrockpillartapestrymosaicnexusbeaconcruciblevanguardepitomeembodimentconfluencetrajectoryunderpinningramificationstakeholderbandwidthdeep-diveparadigm shiftgame-changervalue propositionpain pointuse casebest practicelow-hanging fruitNorth Star
Adverbs Kill List+
moreoverfurthermoreadditionallyconsequentlysubsequentlyneverthelessnonethelessinterestinglyimportantlynotablysignificantlyfundamentallyinherentlyundeniablyremarkablyarguablyessentiallyultimatelyeffectivelyefficientlyholisticallystrategicallymeticulouslyseamlessly
Phrase-Level Tells+

Opening Formulas

In today's rapidly evolving...In the ever-changing landscape...As we navigate the complexities...In an era defined by...It's no secret that...In the world of...When it comes to...At its core...

Transition Formulas

That said...With that in mind...It's worth noting...This begs the question...Let's dive in...Let's unpack this...Having said that...Building on this...

Closing Formulas

In conclusion...At the end of the day...Moving forward...All things considered...The bottom line is...As we look to the future...Only time will tell...The takeaway here is...

ChatGPT-Specific Tells

Absolutely!Great question!I'd be happy to help!Here's the thing...Let me break this down...Buckle up...Spoiler alert:Here's what you need to know...The short answer is...

Hedging Patterns

It's important to note...It could be argued...One might suggest...Perhaps unsurprisingly...It goes without saying...Needless to say...To be fair...In fairness...

A2

How AI Detection Works

Understanding the enemy is step one. Here is how the major detectors decide you are a robot.

Perplexity

Measures how "surprised" a language model is by each word. Human writing has high perplexity — we make unexpected word choices, use weird syntax, throw in slang. AI writing has low perplexity because it always picks the most statistically likely next word. Low perplexity = "probably AI."

Burstiness

Measures variation in sentence structure and length. Humans are "bursty" — we write a 40-word sentence, then a 4-word sentence, then a question, then a fragment. AI writes in remarkably consistent sentence lengths. Low burstiness = "probably AI."

The Major Detectors

GPTZero

Combines perplexity + burstiness scoring. Highlights sentences it flags as AI. Very sensitive to uniform paragraph structure.

Turnitin

Academic-focused. Checks sentence-level perplexity against its training corpus. Particularly good at catching paraphrased AI content.

Originality.ai

Uses a fine-tuned classifier model. Cross-references vocabulary distribution, syntactic patterns, and stylistic consistency. Most aggressive false-positive rate.

Key Insight

Uniform, polished text gets flagged. Sloppy, opinionated, inconsistent writing does not. The detectors are looking for the telltale smoothness of machine-generated content. Human writing is messy, contradictory, and full of personality quirks. That is what makes it unfakeable.

A3

Structural Patterns to Avoid

Beyond individual words, AI has recognizable structural habits. These patterns are often more damning than vocabulary — a human might occasionally use "delve," but no human consistently writes in perfect five-paragraph essay format.

"It's Not X, It's Y" Construction

AI loves this rhetorical frame. "It's not just a token, it's a movement." "It's not about the destination, it's about the journey." It sounds punchy the first time. By the third time in a single article, it is screaming "machine generated."

"$BRAIN is not just a meme coin — it's a revolutionary approach to decentralized investment."
"$BRAIN is a meme coin that invests in things. That is literally the whole pitch."

Compulsive Rule of Three

AI almost always generates lists of exactly three items. "Innovation, transparency, and community." "Fast, secure, and scalable." Human writers use two things, or four things, or seven things, or one thing. The Rule of Three is fine sometimes. Just not every single time.

Uniform Paragraph Structure

AI paragraphs tend to be 3–5 sentences, each roughly the same length. Topic sentence, supporting detail, supporting detail, transition. Human writing is wildly inconsistent. One paragraph is a single sentence. The next is eight sentences with a parenthetical aside and a half-finished thought.

Five-Paragraph Essay

Introduction, three body paragraphs, conclusion. AI defaults to this structure like it is being graded by a high school English teacher. Real writing does not follow a formula. It follows the thought.

Synthetic Earnestness

AI writes like it genuinely, deeply cares about everything equally. Every topic gets the same breathless enthusiasm. Humans do not care about everything equally. We have opinions. We are bored by some things and obsessed with others. Let that show.

Hedged Humor

AI will attempt a joke and then immediately explain it. "You might say the treasury is on a diet — it keeps getting leaner! (But seriously, the deflationary mechanism...)" Humans either commit to the joke or they do not make it.

Perfect Topic Consistency

AI stays relentlessly on-topic. Every sentence connects cleanly to the thesis. Human writing goes on tangents. We mention something unrelated because it reminds us of something. We circle back. Sometimes we do not circle back. That is fine.

A4

The Humanization Playbook

What Makes Human Writing Unfakeable

Agentless Passive

Humans say "the contract was deployed" (who deployed it? who cares). AI avoids passive voice because it was trained to think active voice is always better. Sometimes passive hits harder.

Radical Specificity

Humans cite exact numbers, dates, times. "The treasury had 142.7 SOL at 3am on a Tuesday." AI says "significant funds." Be specific. Always.

Deliberate Inconsistency

Vary sentence length aggressively. A 3-word sentence next to a 30-word sentence. This is burstiness. Detectors love it (the good kind of love).

Contractions Everywhere

"Don't" not "do not." "Won't" not "will not." "Can't" not "cannot." AI under-uses contractions. Humans use them constantly.

Conjunction Starts

Start sentences with "And," "But," "Or," "So." AI avoids this because it was trained on formal writing. Real humans do it constantly. And it works.

Parenthetical Asides

Throw in (slightly off-topic) observations mid-sentence. It breaks the AI's clean paragraph flow and signals genuine human stream-of-consciousness.

Phase One: The Purge

Take your AI-generated draft and strip out everything that screams machine. This is the editing pass that matters most.

  1. Run the draft through the Kill List (Section 02). Replace every flagged word with something a normal person would say.
  2. Break up any paragraph longer than 4 sentences. Or make one paragraph 8 sentences. The point is variation.
  3. Find every list of three and add a fourth item, or remove one. Break the pattern.
  4. Delete any sentence that starts with "Moreover," "Furthermore," or "Additionally." Just connect the thoughts naturally.
  5. Replace every instance of "utilize" with "use." Replace every "implement" with "build" or "ship."
  6. If a sentence sounds like a LinkedIn post, delete it.

Phase Two: The Injection

Now add the human texture. This is where the writing transforms from "cleaned-up AI" to "obviously written by someone with opinions."

Burstiness Injection

Go through the draft and deliberately vary sentence length. Short sentence. Then a long one with multiple clauses and maybe a dash thrown in for emphasis — the kind of sentence that makes a grammar teacher twitch. Then a fragment. Like this one. The rhythm should feel like conversation, not composition.

Human Texture

Add a minor tangent that you circle back from. Reference something specific (a date, a time, a particular wallet address, a tweet). Use a contraction where the AI used the full form. Throw in an opinion — not a hedged "one might argue" opinion, but a flat statement: "This is better. Full stop."

Tonal Oscillation

Alternate between registers. A dead-serious technical paragraph about fee distribution, followed by a sarcastic aside about cheese reserves. Professionalism and absurdism in the same piece. That is the $BRAIN voice. AI cannot do this well because it tries to maintain a consistent tone. Do not be consistent.

The Read-Aloud Test

Read the final draft out loud. If any sentence makes you feel like a corporate press release robot, rewrite it in the way you would actually say it to someone at a bar. That version is better. It is always better.

A5

Content Checklist

Run every piece of $BRAIN content through this checklist before publishing. If you cannot check every box, revise.

Voice & Tone

Does it sound like a human wrote it? (Read it aloud.)

Is there tonal oscillation? (Technical + absurd, not uniform.)

Would Brain approve the strategy? Would Pinky laugh at the joke?

Does it avoid corporate buzzwords and LinkedIn energy?

Is it self-aware about being a meme token?

AI Detection

No Kill List words used on autopilot?

Sentence length varies significantly? (Burstiness check.)

Paragraph length varies? (No uniform 3-5 sentence blocks.)

Contains at least one contraction per paragraph?

Starts at least one sentence with And/But/Or/So?

No "It's not X, it's Y" construction (or used sparingly)?

No compulsive Rule of Three?

Substance

Contains at least one specific number, date, or address?

Links to verifiable on-chain data where relevant?

Technical claims are accurate?

Does not promise returns or guaranteed outcomes?

Brand

References the project's theme naturally (not forced)?

Includes a concrete call to action?

Would a community member share this?

Does it make the reader feel something? (Humor, curiosity, conviction.)

A6

The Assignment Template

Use this template when creating any long-form content about $BRAIN. Whether you are writing the article yourself or feeding instructions to an LLM, this structure ensures the output matches the brand.

assignment-template.md

# Article Structure

 

## 1. The Hook (1-2 sentences)

Open with something unexpected. A question,

a contradiction, a bold claim. Not "In today's

rapidly evolving landscape..."

 

## 2. The Context (1-2 paragraphs)

What is $BRAIN and why should the reader care?

Use specific numbers. Link to the War Room.

Be concrete, not abstract.

 

## 3. The Meat (3-5 paragraphs)

The actual content. Technical details, strategy

updates, ecosystem analysis. Vary paragraph

length aggressively. Include at least one

tangent or aside.

 

## 4. The Twist (1 paragraph)

A perspective shift. Challenge an assumption.

Say something slightly controversial. Make the

reader think.

 

## 5. The Close (1-3 sentences)

End on a strong note. Not a summary. Not

"in conclusion." A final punch. Maybe a

callback to the hook. Maybe a Pinky quote.

 

# Requirements

 

- Minimum 2 specific numbers/dates/addresses

- At least 1 link to on-chain data

- No more than 2 Kill List words total

- Sentence length range: 3 words to 40+ words

- At least 1 sentence starting with And/But/So

- Passes GPTZero at <15% AI probability

- Makes at least one person laugh or think

- References Pinky and the Brain naturally

- Includes a clear call to action

Same thing we do every night, Pinky.

Try to write content that doesn't get flagged by GPTZero.

NARF.